[consult] Call for Community Consultation - Software Repository
Michael Smith
mksmith at adhost.com
Fri Jan 18 01:07:25 EST 2008
- Previous message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Software Repository
- Next message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Software Repository
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello All: Comments in line. On Jan 16, 2008, at 12:14 PM, Member Services wrote: > ARIN received a suggestion (2008.1) that "ARIN shall maintain a > software > repository (with retrieval via anonymous FTP, HTTP, or other protocols > in keeping with best current practices) for user-contributed schemas, > software, and other tools for dealing with data published by ARIN." > > The complete suggestion can be viewed at: > http://www.arin.net/acsp/suggestions/2008-1.html > > As a result, ARIN would like to solicit input to the following > questions > from the following community: > 1. Should software in this repository be restricted only to > contributions that are licensed to be in the public domain? If so, > what > license should be used (GNU/BSD/others)? As long as the author provides consent directly or tacitly by uploading the software themselves, that should be sufficient. I don't think ARIN needs to adhere to any one license. However, a nicely worded disclaimer about warranties or, more specifically, a lack thereof, is probably advised. > > 2. Should the repository allow separate developers facilities to > maintain code directly (tools like subversion) or be a static-read > only > repository? I opt for static-read only because I think that a CVS repository steps outside of ARIN's mission. I like the idea of providing tools to the ARIN community, but I don't think the ARIN membership should incur the costs of maintaining a CVS repository for software. Having a web page that either links to outside sites or to a local ARIN site is preferable to me. > > 3. Should the repository only house collections that reflect ARIN's > mission? > I think so. If not, where would it end? Would ARIN become a FreeBSD mirror, or a CPAN mirror? Not that I particularly mind either way, but I think the ARIN Membership through the Board and Advisory Council should limit the scope of the site to those things that pertain to: 1) ARIN-provided services 2) RIR-provided services Personally, I would opt for number 2 because a lot of the stuff I have to do transcends ARIN to the RIR's as a whole. Regards, Mike Smith mksmith at adhost.com
- Previous message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Software Repository
- Next message: [consult] Call for Community Consultation - Software Repository
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the ARIN-consult mailing list