[consult] Call for Consultation - Suggestion to Remove the WHOIS Query Result Limit

Hello,
 
Pleasure of greeting them, 
I sent an e-mail several days ago, to do a consultation on IP's acquisition and ACE Public, but the response already her indicated the group of www.lacnic.net.

Thank you very much
 
Call me questions 

Greetings 

Juan Duque
Consultor de proyectos
Gerencia de Desarrollo e Integración de Productos
Telecomunicaciones Movilnet.
+58-212-705.72.90
+58-416-606.27.10
juan.duque at movilnet.com.ve
 
 
-----Mensaje original-----
De: consult-bounces at arin.net [mailto:consult-bounces at arin.net] En nombre de michael.c.loevner at verizon.com
Enviado el: Martes, 13 de Marzo de 2007 09:08 a.m.
Para: Edward Lewis
CC: consult-bounces at arin.net; consult at arin.net
Asunto: Re: [consult] Call for Consultation - Suggestion to Remove the WHOIS Query Result Limit

I've run into situations in the past where I can't lookup all of the 
resources of a company that we may be acquiring or merging with because of 
the 256 record limit.  One improvement that could be made to the WHOIS 
that might help is to include a mechanism that allows one to query for 
direct allocations only for a particular OrgID or registration holder 
name.

Also, ARIN staff has been helpful in the past in providing the full query 
when the number of returned records exceed 256.  For myself, the 
infrequency with which I run into the query limit doesn't warrant a 
change, especially since ARIN staff is willing to provide the larger 
dataset if needed.  If anybody runs into this limit frequently, I'd like 
to hear about it. 

-Mike




"Edward Lewis" <Ed.Lewis at neustar.biz> 
Sent by: consult-bounces at arin.net
03/12/2007 09:41 PM

To
consult at arin.net
cc

Subject
Re: [consult] Call for Consultation - Suggestion to Remove the WHOIS Query 
Result Limit






What kinds of numbers are we looking at?

I mean, like, of all the "meaningful" queries, what would return the 
most?  How many would be over 1000?  When I say "meaningful" I am 
subjectively insinuating we don't care to honor data mining queries. 
(O *)

There are only two reasons to limit the number. Budget for servers 
and bandwith is one, the other is data mining.  It's hard to know 
what makes sense without more detail on why 256 is a problem and 
whether it should be, say, doubled or more.
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis +1-571-434-5468
NeuStar

Sarcasm doesn't scale.
_______________________________________________
consult mailing list
consult at arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/consult



_______________________________________________
consult mailing list
consult at arin.net
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/consult